Close
This site uses cookies

By using this site, you consent to our use of cookies. You can view our terms and conditions for more information.

Return to Session

On bias, signal detection, and sequential sampling

Authors
Ørjan Røkkum Brandtzæg
Norwegian University of Science and Technology ~ Psychology
Prof. Robert Biegler
NTNU ~ Psychology
Abstract

We aim to address two issues. First, empirical work on how payoff asymmetries can bias decisions has used the total number of false positives compared to the total number of false negatives as a criterion. We explain why and when this criterion dissociates from bias c such that one criterion can indicate a liberal bias while the other indicates a conservative bias. Second, what is the optimal decision criterion in a sequential sampling problem, in which noise can be reduced by increased sampling, but at a cost? We derive a function for the cost of sampling, and use that to find the optimal sampling effort for a range of parameters. We will examine both using the case of male sexual overperception, the tendency of men to either believe or to act as if women are more interested in sex than is actually the case. The argument generalises to other examples of decisions under asymmetric payoffs.

Tags

Keywords

signal detection theory
error management theory
bias
sequential sampling
information gathering

Topics

Perception and Signal Detection
Discussion
New

There is nothing here, yet. Be the first to create a thread